What constitutes a repeat violation?

A repeat violation is defined as a violation of the same ordinance occurring within a specific timeframe, which is commonly five years. This concept is crucial in code enforcement because it addresses the persistence of non-compliance. When a property owner is found in violation of the same code or regulation more than once within the five-year period, it underscores a pattern of disregard for the law, warranting an increased response from enforcement agencies.

Option C highlights this understanding by specifying that the repeat violation must be of the same ordinance, reinforcing the idea that the intent is to penalize continued non-compliance with specific regulations. This framework allows for the enforcement of consistency and encourages compliance by property owners.

The other options do not accurately reflect the standard definition of a repeat violation. A new violation of a different ordinance does not signify repeat behavior under the same regulation, and a violation occurring after five years falls outside the definition altogether, as the timeframe resets after that period. Lastly, stating that any violation qualifies regardless of time fails to capture the critical element of repeated offenses within a designated timeframe relevant to the enforcement of the same regulation.