What is considered relevant direct evidence?

Relevant direct evidence is defined as evidence that directly demonstrates a fact without the need for any inferential reasoning. In this context, it refers to evidence that clearly shows an act or behavior by the alleged violator. This type of evidence is strong and straightforward, allowing for a clear connection to the violation in question. For example, if a code enforcement officer witnesses a property owner committing a violation, that observation serves as direct evidence of the alleged act and can be used in legal proceedings to substantiate claims against the violator.

Other forms of evidence may involve additional steps in reasoning or rely on the context surrounding an event, thus lacking the immediacy and clarity provided by direct evidence. For instance, circumstantial evidence or evidence that requires inference from other facts does not have the same direct link to the act being assessed, making them less robust when trying to establish a specific violation.