What standard of evidence is required in a Code Case?

In a Code Case, the standard of evidence required is competent, substantial evidence on the record as a whole. This standard means that the evidence presented must be sufficient to support the conclusions drawn by the enforcement authority. It reflects a thorough evaluation of the totality of the evidence, taking into account the credibility of witnesses, the reliability of the information provided, and the overall context in which the evidence is presented.

This standard is essential in ensuring that decisions made in code enforcement matters are based on a comprehensive assessment of the facts, rather than isolated pieces of evidence that may not accurately represent the situation. It ensures that the findings are reasonable and justified, promoting fairness and due process in the enforcement of codes and regulations.

In contrast, the other options represent different legal standards not applicable in this context, such as minimal evidence, which lacks the rigor needed for effective decision-making in enforcement; clear and convincing evidence, which is a heavier burden typically used in civil cases where the stakes are higher, such as in certain civil rights cases; and preponderance of the evidence, which, while commonly used in civil litigation, does not encompass the breadth of the evaluation required in a Code Case.