What type of evidence may not be sufficient alone to support a finding?

Admissible hearsay may not be sufficient alone to support a finding because, while it can be presented in court under certain conditions, it is generally considered less reliable than other forms of evidence. Hearsay involves statements made outside of the court that are offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted. Because the original speaker is not present to be cross-examined, the credibility of this type of evidence is often questioned, making it weaker in terms of persuasive power compared to direct evidence or even circumstantial evidence.

In legal proceedings, it is ideal for evidence to not only be admissible but also to hold significant weight. Other forms of evidence, such as direct evidence, which comes from firsthand knowledge or observation, or circumstantial evidence, which relies on inference, tend to provide a more solid foundation for a finding. Therefore, while hearsay can play a role in court, relying on it solely without additional corroborative evidence typically falls short of what is necessary to substantiate a finding effectively.