Which of the following is NOT an example of material facts in code enforcement?

In the context of code enforcement, material facts are those that have significance in determining the outcome of a case or situation, particularly regarding the enforcement of regulations. The identity of the owner, the specific code provision in question, and whether there was a violation of that provision are all factual elements that directly impact enforcement decisions.

Personal opinions of neighbors, on the other hand, do not constitute material facts. While these opinions can provide context or indicate community sentiment, they are subjective and do not have a direct bearing on whether a code violation has occurred or on the legal implications of such a violation. In a code enforcement scenario, decisions must be made based on objective, factual information rather than personal beliefs or opinions, which may vary widely and may not be rooted in verifiable evidence. This distinction is crucial for maintaining objectivity and fairness in the enforcement process.