Which violation represents an exception to the Reasonable Time clause in Chapter 162 Part Two?

The exception to the Reasonable Time clause in Chapter 162 Part Two is represented by itinerant or transient violations. This is significant because itinerant or transient violations often involve conditions that are not permanent and can change rapidly. For instance, violations caused by temporary situations, like street vendors operating without permits or individuals who set up temporary camps, typically require immediate attention due to their nature.

The Reasonable Time clause generally allows property owners a set timeframe to remedy violations; however, these types of violations can pose immediate risks or hazards that call for more expedited action to protect public health and safety. This urgency overrides the standard expectation of a reasonable time for compliance, making a swift response necessary for these particular violations.

Permanent violations, property line disputes, and civil infractions do not have the same urgency or characteristic as itinerant or transient violations, as they may allow for a more extended remedy period without posing an immediate threat to the community or public health.